The Human Assembly Line

The Human Assembly Line
Refuge in Denial....


Follow Us

Breaking News

The Will of the Human Spirit

The Will of the Human Spirit
Ignorance & Stupidity

Sunday, 3 February 2013

Hold the BBC accountable to show the true evidence of 9/11

Our media has been lying to us about the true facts of 9/11 and withholding vital evidence that they have a duty to show to the public.  As a consequence, our rights and freedoms continue to be taken away from us here in the UK, British troops continue to die fighting fraudulent wars based on lies and manufactured events, and hundreds of thousands of innocent people around the world are being needlessly murdered.  The BBC has conclusive evidence proving that the official story of 9/11 is false, and it is now on their own official records that they possess this evidence, however they refuse to show this evidence to the public.  

In September 2011 the BBC showed two 9/11 conspiracy documentaries to coincide with the tenth anniversary of 9/11. These documentaries were extremely biased to support the official story of 9/11 and as such were in breach of the BBC's own legal requirements to be impartial and to provide factual information. They showed factually incorrect information and they witheld vital evidence which seriously challenges the official story.  The BBC were challenged on this through their own formal complaints process, which included being provided with detailed evidence from four expert professionals who each have professional credentials of an extremely high level, as follows:
1.  Dwain Deets, Former NASA Director of Aeronautics
2.  Richard Gage, CEO of 'Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth'
3.  Erik Lawyer, Founder of 'Fire Fighters for 9/11 Truth'
4.  Jake Jacobs, Veteran US airline pilot of the same planes as were allegedly involved in 9/11
We can provide you with each of their letters of testimony and evidence if you wish.
As part of this campaign these experts each submitted their separate documents of evidence to the BBC and asked that it be shown to the public.  This request was backed up by hundreds of written requests from the public from all over the world. The BBC refused to show the evidence.  So the four experts submitted their evidence to the House of Commons Media Committee and asked them to hold the BBC accountable to the requirements of their Royal Charter and Agreement and to show the evidence to the public. This request to the Media Committee was also supported by hundreds of written requests from the public from all over the world. The Media Committee's response to this was to say that they cannot get involved in this because members of the public must raise these issues through their local MP first.
The evidence provided here is impossible to ignore and there is a legal process here that the MPs must follow.

Historic court case against the BBC's cover up of 9/11 evidence

The BBC is being challenged strongly for its refusal to present to the British public the available scientific evidence which contradicts the official version of events of 9/11.  Thank you very much to all those who have sent letters to their MPs asking that the BBC be held to account for withholding this evidence that the public must be allowed to see.

As a further progression of this campaign, a great opportunity has arisen.  9/11 truth documentary maker Tony Rooke has been granted a court hearing where he is challenging the BBC's support of terrorist activity through supporting the cover up of the true evidence of 9/11.  The court case will take place on February 25th at 10.00am at the address below. 
Real 9/11 evidence has rarely, if ever, been presented in a British court room, so this is a rare opportunity.  Any support from the public on the day would be fantastic and will help to send the message that the people want to know, and deserve to know, the truth about 9/11. 

Horsham Magistrates’ Court [Court 3]The Law Courts
Hurst Road
West Sussex
RH12 2ET

This court case is based around Tony making a stand and refusing to pay his TV licence fee under Section 15 of The Terrorism Act 2000 Article 3 which states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism.  The BBC has withheld scientific evidence which clearly demonstrates that the official version of events of 9/11 is not possible and could not have been carried out in entirety by those who have been accused by our officials.  In addition, the BBC has actively blocked and smeared those attempting to bring this evidence to the public.  By doing this the BBC are supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and are therefore supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have not yet been identified and held to account.  A new and independent investigation is required to determine what really did occur on 9/11, and by whom, otherwise these unidentified terrorist elements will remain free to potentially commit further terrorist activities.   

Tony has been charged with a crime for not paying his TV licence fee, however, he has lodged a legal challenge to this charge and has now been successful in being granted an appearance in a Magistrate’s court where he has three hours available to present his evidence to defend himself against the charge.  Tony has formed a formidable team to support him in presenting the evidence, including the following two outstanding individuals:

Professor Niels Harrit
Niels Harrit is a Professor of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen and is one of the world’s leading experts on the scientific evidence which contradicts the official story of 9/11.  Professor Harrit's team of scientists proved that there was nano-thermite residue (high tech military explosive) all through the dust of all three towers and he got this study peer reviewed and published in an official scientific journal.  He is also an expert on the other aspects of scientific evidence indicating controlled demolition of the three towers.  He was involved in a major interview with the BBC in 2011 where the BBC clearly attempted to harass and discredit Professor Harrit rather than look at the devastating scientific evidence he had to offer.  Professor Harrit's team have video footage of this harassment and highly inappropriate conduct by the BBC both on camera and off camera as part of that interview.

Tony Farrell
Tony Farrell is a former Intelligence Analyst for South Yorkshire Police Department.  In 2010 he was fired because he felt compelled by his conscience to tell the truth in his official report and state that due to his extensive analysis of 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings, the greatest terrorist threat to the public did not come from Islamic extremists but from internal sources within the US and British establishment.  He is now dedicating his life to helping to expose the truth and he is challenging his dismissal through international court.  Tony Rooke has recently produced an excellent documentary called ‘Offensive - the story of Tony Farrell’ based around the story of Tony Farrell.  

In addition, here is the other documentary that Tony has recently produced called ‘Reasonable Cause’ which gives a good insight into the type of work that Tony has been engaged in and the type of information and evidence that he will be presenting at his court case.   


Other members of Tony’s presentation team include:

Ian Henshall, Leading UK author on 9/11 and founder of the UK based group 'Reinvestigate9/11'
Ray Savage, Former Counter Terrorism Officer who believes the official 9/11 story is not reasonable to believe

As well as these presenters there are detailed written testimonies of evidence and support from our four other 9/11 experts:

Richard Gage, CEO of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth'
Dwain Deets, Former NASA Director of Aerospace Projects
Erik Lawyer, Founder of 'Fire Fighters for 9/11 Truth'
Jake Jacobs, Veteran US airline pilot & member of 'Pilots for 9/11 Truth'

Please consider attending this historic court case to support Tony in this rare opportunity to have some of the true facts of 9/11 presented in a court of law and to have the BBC held to account for their support of the cover up of the true scientific evidence of 9/11.