Showing posts with label Social Engineering. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Engineering. Show all posts

Thursday, 31 August 2023

PLANDEMIC: Indoctornation - The Movie

When journalists or those who broadcast our daily news face a crisis of conscience due to being forced to lie to the public, it eventually takes its toll. This inevitably leads to a mental breakdown. Of course, those who force them to deceive us are following the remit of the ultra clandestine, CFR (aka. Council on Foreign Relations) and Tavistock Institute (of Human Relations) Some of these journalists may already be familiar names. I believe that BBC TV news presenter, Huw Edwards may be a victim of this, hence the reason why the false accusations made against him suddenly disappeared from media coverage overnight. There is a great deal of mainstream media reliance on "Out of Sight, Out of Mind". The alleged victims of the so-called Novichok Salisbury poisonings are perhaps perfect examples of this, since it is unlikely that the UK public even remember Sergei and Yulia Skripal or query their whereabouts, further preventing the public from even being aware that Porton Down is in Salisbury, right on the doorstep of the alleged victims, the Skripal's and that it is a science and defence technology campus, specialising in biological warfare

We already know what happens to those who dare speak the Truth. Whistleblowers. Julian Assange and Edward Snowden are just two examples. Assassination by bullet, accident, sudden illness or suicide raises too many unwelcome questions in today's modern society, so character assassination is the preferred method in a world where `we' are so dependent on the media. Those who comply are elevated as honoury members of the cabal. They have and currently include Walter Cronkite, Barbara Walters, Oprah Winfrey, Dan Rather and of course, Rupert Murdoch who are/were all members of the CFR and play a significant role within the New World Order agenda. As well as 20th Century Fox and NBC among others, Disney and abc became corporate members of the CFR in 1995. The British arm of the CFR is Chatham House, also known as The Royal Institute of International Affairs. Its stated mission is to help governments and societies build a sustainably secure, prosperous and just world.




A Warning about Disinformation Agents

However, I do have one issue with this video and it is one of caution. It is its endorsement of David Ickewho many suspect of being a tool of the Deep State NWO, hence his Reptilian theories. Such conspiracies are deliberately created to be so ludicrous in order to generate negative public attitudes towards genuine Truth Seeking and thoroughly investigated research and exposed historical events and current affairs. This objective has trademarked the term, Conspiracy Theorist as a derogatory term, to be subjected to ridicule in order to disarm intellectual independent critical thought and elevate the status of the fool, who is an oblivious self imposed victim of the Dunning-Kruger effect

I had warned about David Icke some time ago since he has plagiarized some of my work from this blog for years. However, I am not alone. Icke has been plagiarizing the hard work of investigative researchers and respected authors including and not limited to Tom Horn, Bill Cooper and Jordan Maxwell throughout his career. I'm afraid it doesn't end there either. One of Icke's protege's is "Chris Everard". Everard excels in his shameless plagiarism of other people's hard work. I first became suspicious about Everard around 15 years ago while watching a documentary on YouTube featuring Everard. He made reference to the case that got me started in investigative research when I was just aged 15 after my father told me about the 1888 Jack the Ripper murders in Whitechapel. I was intrigued and began investigating and digging deep ever since. Now, in later years, I still am and have written about it in this blog. During Everard's film, he made reference to a  "William" Sickert. I was astonished since Everard clearly didn't even get the name right. Of course he was referring to the Victorian artist, Walter Sickert. This clearly demonstrated his ignorance and delusions of grandeur in his haste to steal the work of someone else. Everard had just heard or read about the Ripper case briefly and quickly claimed the research as his own. He presents himself as someone of intellectual authority, yet demonstrates the complete opposite. It exposed Everard as an incompetent fool and fraud who had absolutely no integrity, honour, or credibility whatsoever. He is a total unashamed charlatan, liar and con man. He makes outrageous claims of false investigations he has done, including in recent years having been granted access to the caves underneath the Vatican. A radio talk show foolishly interviewed Everard about this, giving him a platform for his narcissistic personality disorder to boast his false claims. UK police were also interested in Everard at one point, causing him to flee to France. I urge anyone to please beware of Chris Everard and David Icke at all costs and help expose them for what they really are.




Monday, 13 March 2017

Apathy: An Acceptable Level of Evil



What I find most disturbing today is that my generation has been so subdued
that its blind apathy has led it to an acceptable level of evil. How much further must our social conditioning lead us to the boundaries of abomination where the sexual abuse of children and their self harming is socially endorsed as an unfortunate but acceptable symptom of modern society? If this is our position in 2004, how much further will our humanity sink into the abyss in the next generation? Must my spirit imprisoned in flesh have to travel through the ages to ask the same questions of each generation?






















Tuesday, 20 September 2016

The Mark of The Beast being Socially Engineered as Normal Practice

Some time ago I wrote an article after seeing the first use of hand scanners in local supermarkets. I was deeply concerned at the time having just written about the deception of grocery loyalty card schemes and how they recorded the most personal intimate details of our daily living. People are unwittingly submitting themselves to this every day since the value of the discount vouchers they receive in their post is calculated based on our weekly shopping routine. In other words, your receipt is recorded and as a result, information is gathered about your daily home life. This reveals how many people you live with and the sex, age, habits, personal hygiene, health and much more information about of each person in your household. In addition, as soon as you go outside your front door, your image is captured up 300 times a day on CCTV. With all this information, it is only a short matter of time until it is compressed onto a chip.

 
While out on a Saturday night, a guy next to me at the bar paid for a round of drinks by having his phone scanned. He may as well have ran his own hand across the scanner. I have even found myself paying for groceries using a contactless debit card just for convenience, barely noticing that therein lies the deception. While in Amsterdam, I witnessed people scanning their hands to gain entry to nightclubs. After approaching one guy about this, he proudly boasted about having a chip injected beneath his skin. This tiptoe totalitarianism is what each of us are submitting to everyday, oblivious that we are being incrementally conditioned to surrender ourselves to the Mark of The Beast.

At what stage will the next generation be indoctrinated? Yesterday it was our pets....
In 2010 Channel 4 News reports of a plan to microchip all life on earth, yet nobody noticed

In 2010 this blog published an article in an attempt to warn about how the Mark of The Beast would be so common that it would be taken for granted to the extent that we would be completely oblivious to what we were sacrificing ourselves to. It explained my theory that cell phone wireless technology had been discovered as far back as 1970 and that it had been held back for a specific purpose. The theory originated from one of those annoying questions that inquisitive kids ask adults. Mine was inspired by the 1969 alleged landing on the moon. From the innocent mind of a child came the question, "How can they talk to a man on the moon from earth without being plugged in somewhere back on earth....?" 

House of the Temple in Washington DC, there is a photograph of Neil Armstrong holding his Masonic apron

One of the objectives of the Apollo missions was to bankrupt the Soviet Union so that during a staged `Space race' the USSR would spend billions to beat the Americans to the moon. However, there is also an occult origin behind the US space explorations. The name `Apollo' is derived from the Greek, "Apollyon". The Hebrew name is "Abaddon". Apollyon/Abaddon is a Satanic deity and the translation into English means, "The Destroyer". When Freemasons reach the 17th degree, they are introduced to the secret password granting them access to Abaddon. Neil Armstrong was a Freemason and apparently there is a photograph of him standing on the moon or (Stanley Kubrick staged film set)  proudly displaying his masonic apron. Freemasonry originates from the days of King Solomon who was granted the powers to summon both angels and demons to do his will so that he could conquer his enemies.

However, I digress slightly. Although, as one of the motivations of the Apollo missions has been previously explained, there was another. This objective was to replicate an orchestrated scheme that had been implemented during the 1920's. It was to indoctrinate a new generation. Just as youth culture had been indoctrinated during the "roaring 20's", the same template had been deployed for the "swinging 60's". Since this provided the necessary evidence that each generation could be controlled, it not only prevented unwelcome questions from being asked and the potential for revolution carried from the previous century, it created consistency in western culture to be passed on to each generation with a Trojan horse masquerading as an ideology of family values. In the US, such an ideology was sold to the American people as "The American Dream" and soon the term became embedded in the mindset of every American citizen from the beginning of the 1950's, thereby controlling the `unit', (i.e. the family) rather than the `individual' who might be rebel and was generally viewed with suspicion and socially ostracized.


In an earlier article I explained how the "Mark of the Beast" would be introduced through technology. As the CIA seized control of Hollywood under the cover of the 1950's McCarthy Witch hunts, movies today such as "The Matrix, Prometheus etc" have an underlying motive that many may not be aware of by setting the stage for incremental indoctrination. Since the cell phone was introduced during the late 1990s, it was followed by the iPod, portable MP3 players and an abundance of cell phone applications, all marketed towards young people, with each new related technology and application being branded as "Cool" in accordance with youth culture terminology. It set the stage for the next `cool' product to be marketed towards the younger generation, the embedded chip. This would not be so difficult in a rapidly increasing environment where religion means nothing to modern youth and is greeted with skepticism and disdain due to manufactured war and conflict.

In 2010, I published a UK news item on my old website that ought to have caused alarm, yet few had even noticed it. It was a story about a plan to chip all life on earth on Channel 4 News.

.....And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark — the name of the beast or the number of its name. Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is six hundred sixty-six.…



Saturday, 28 May 2016

Richard Hall & Neil Sanders - Mind Control

Regular visitors to this blog will already know that I have already written extensively about Mind Control and Social Engineering as can be found in the labels below and to the right of this page. Further information can also be found on the slightly outdated Apathy Kills website.


....in brain-stimulation research four decades ago, goes largely unacknowledged today. What happened?





Thursday, 31 October 2013

The Eugenics Culture & The Long Term Consequences of Abandoning The Vulnerable & Human Compassion






It is important to every one of us that we take note of what this news item is telling us, since it was repeated over other news networks. Why? Because if we don't, then it demonstrates categorically the extent of the control that the corporate mainstream media has in shaping our view of the world. The correspondent states that, "Our attitudes towards the disabled have changed!" If this is the case, then it is a frightening and damning  indictment to how the human natural capacity for compassion has changed towards those distressed and in despair, made much worse by our abandonment of them.

However, the rhetoric may well have been applied by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in an effort to indoctrinate an oblivious society into a socially engineered acceptance of Human Carnage. It is a condition that we may only become aware of when it eventually reaches us, by which time, we will have already sacrificed our right to expect any clemency.

The impact of the statement on `our attitudes towards the disabled...' will have gone unnoticed, since most people will have automatically accepted it as a symptom of modern society and go with the flow. Yet, the irony is that these are the very people who are most likely to denounce `conspiracy theories', emphatically denying that anybody has control over them, and failing to recognise the contradiction. How many people listening to the early evening news item paused to ask themselves, "How on earth did we let this happen?" Few will be in a position to even recollect the transition of the human state of mind and consciousness. That critical period is clearly defined throughout this blog, so if anyone still possesses an old diary, it may be wise to make a cautionary note for our grandchildren. Few will be unprepared to acknowledge the frightening consequences of our indifference, for if we fail to take account of the stages of our social evolution today, then how much more will we readily accept in forty years from now? By the mid 21st Century, human disability may be a thing of the past, but only because they are exterminated.

What was unthinkable yesterday is reality today, due to the fact that we allowed it to happen, and we may well be held accountable.

***********************

In 1991, a very decisive speech was made that was to mark the impending transition of human consciousness that had been planned almost 300 years earlier, although its presence had been known, academics had only begun to engage it then. When that benchmark had been reached, the figures that are in power today had already been positioned, almost 10 years before we had even heard of their names. Such figures, which may seem important to us are irrelevant to those whom they serve. To them, they are nanobot subordinates performing a function as part of a much larger, incomprehensible agenda.


***********************

THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RELATIONS: Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and Economic Decline of the United States


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 15 September 2013

The Conjuring Debunked? The Andrea Perron Hoax (2nd edition)

This is not usually the type of article I would normally write. However, its intention is an attempt to demonstrate the extent of how Hollywood and the mainstream media shapes our way of thinking and perception of reality. For me the most captivating part of the supernatural movie The Conjuring was the publicity, with the increasingly familiar term, "Based on a true story" applied to its description, with the emphasis on the word `based'.  By now it has almost become a cliché when anything emerges from Hollywood. As a serious researcher, the temptation to investigate further was too difficult to resist as our natural instinct can often be overpowering.  Having a 2.1 BA (Hons) Film with Media Studies may also have contributed, since I wrote a dissertation on the evolution of film and Hollywood.  So many people have been captivated by the publicity for The Conjuring, that they have forgotten to ask the most basic, yet crucial questions. If anything has been proven from the movie, it is a demonstration that the masses can be so easily deceived, and somebody somewhere is bound to be observing this behavior, perhaps in relation to Neuro-linguistic programming. The same mass hysteria emerged when Dan Brown's controversial book The Di Vinci Code was released. Again, people failed to ask the most obvious questions, such as the narrow time lapse between the book and the movie. While publicists may have intended for this to happen, it obscures its intended purpose. It planted a seed and as a result many believed the The Di Vinci Code to be true, or at least they formed their own narrative as being `based' on a true story. It is this sense of control that I find particularly frightening. When someone once asked what frightened me the most, I answered, `people'.

  

I am not a sceptic, as I do believe in the paranormal. However, while approaching The Conjuring with an open mind, hoping it might be true, the one thing that was missing is "Evidence".  Any serious paranormal investigator records all their findings as evidence and to verify in their own minds what they actually witnessed and to cross reference throughout their entire work. A true investigator accumulates and documents their findings and although the Warrens keep a museum of relics and souvenirs with stories attached, apparently it seems they keep no documented audio/video records that presents credible physical evidence. To do otherwise eliminates the term `investigator' from their vocation. What happened to the actual recordings the Warrens made during their investigation of the old Arnold farm in Harrisville? Despite the movie itself exhibiting this so overtly, nobody raises this most crucial question and no recorded evidence seems to exist.


Furthermore, Andrea Perron falsely claims that the 1885 photo shows the alleged witch, Bathsheba Sherman. This is a untrue, since there is no indication or evidence that she appears in the old photo, and if she does, she would be a very old woman, given the year. However, one figure shows a girl wearing a what appears to be a protective surgical mask?

Despite the absence of any recorded evidence in the Perron house, which a clear indication of fabrication, another striking absence adds weight to the Perron story being a hoax. There is no historical record of Bathsheba Sherman other than her grave. There is no historical record of any `trial' having taken place. In other words she exists in name only and is only the Eleanor Rigby in a Hollywood script.







Enhanced by Zemanta