Showing posts with label Hitler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hitler. Show all posts

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

Assad Issues a Challenge to the U.S. and UK Hypocrites


We must remember what President Assad says here about `evidence', "Present the evidence to the public!" He reminds us that when they don't have any evidence, they manufacture it, as the record has clearly shown. So, be prepared. In this interview, Assad also indicates that he does not actually possess chemical weapons, when asked what his response would be to a U.S. attack. This is while John Kerry issues a warning that he hand over his chemical weapons, thus entrapping Assad, thereby granting the U.S. justification to attack. Also, notice how William Hague adopted the same timely scathing rhetoric to match John Kerry's ridiculous statement of despair by comparing Assad with `Hitler'. Two key points to take note of are:
  • Hague has accused Assad of having `a record of Human Rights atrocities'. This blatant lie and indication of despair has absolutely no shred of evidence whatsoever, and if it were true, then why haven't we ever heard of Assad previously, before the UN attempted to steal his oil and natural resources? In addition to this, there is an abundance of evidence that Assad was highly popular among the majority of his own people, not forgetting that the so-called rebels are foreigners. We should also take note of the frequent language used by the mainstream media, such as "Regime". This has become a fashionable derogatory term used by the media (Tavistock Institute and Chatham House) when they want to indoctrinate the gullible minions into believing that the target subject ought to be discredited and treated with derision. It is interesting that in John Kerry's desperate reference to `Hitler', the Third Reich was never referred to as a `regime'. However, perhaps the mastery of seducing the masses was the desired objective of Hitler's alleged enemies at the time. The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations was founded immediately after WWII in 1946 and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.
   
Script supplied courtesy of the Tavistock Institute
 
  • William Hague has the sheer audacity to even mention addressing a Syrian "Humanitarian crisis". The glaringly obvious question that arises from this is, "Since when has war criminal, David Cameron `ever' shown any sign of even having a conscience, when he has a record for inflicting vast barbaric Humanitarian suffering, and even made no secret of his disdain for the Human Rights Act, expressing a wish to abolish it?" Since 2010, David Cameron will be recorded in history as a ruthless sadist for inflicting a devastating campaign to destroy compassion in society. And, since we are on the topic of "evidence", we only need to objectively examine Cameron's disturbing sadistic record to date.




Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 10 August 2013

From 2010 - 2013: The Assault on the Human Spirit & Breaking our Will. Forecast 2050



If your Government can convince the people that spending money on the Poor and Most Vulnerable is a Waste of Resources, then this is only a short step away:

Creating an acceptable level of Evil
Eliminating Poverty by eliminating the poor
 And, if you think that the masses cannot be so easily manipulated and deceived, then try telling that to the descendents of these people:
Mass Deception
It's only a matter of time. The extermination of Expendable containers has already begun.

The advantage of Evil is that it can be rationalized and justified for the acceptance of the people. This process is known by a more palatable name, `Politics'.

#HASHCOREDavidCameron, the personification of Evil
Same Seed or Entity. Different faces

In the UK, the media is currently engaged in the process of propagating the impression that the majority of people favour cuts on spending on the poorest and most vulnerable victims of a deadly and most critical disease, while its barbaric impact on peoples lives is NOT being reported. In other words, according to a Government controlled media, if a horrific virus were to spread to the UK after claiming millions of lives abroad, the great British public would push all the most vulnerable victims to the front-line as a buffer to protect themselves from infection. And, to justify their heartless actions in their own minds, they disdainfully attach blame to these defenseless and weak victims for causing the epidemic. They rarely question what happens to them when they run out of sacrificial scapegoats. Is this not a damning indictment of the Brits? The critical condition I refer to is called banker manufactured "recession" and the laborer's of the human barricades are already the oblivious incubators of a much more potent and malign virus that lays dormant, waiting to consume and devour them. There is no anecdote for those who are already dead. Their virus is otherwise known as "apathy". And, while there are agents upon the earth to administer a cure, they cannot possibly reach everyone.

Today, suicides in the UK are rapidly on the increase, due to increasing despair and distress caused by austerity. A Public Relations campaign was launched in 2010 to ruthlessly vilify the poor, sick, disabled and terminally ill, and the 2012 London Olympics was cruelly exploited as a platform to promote and justify it. The event was also treated as an opportunity to mock the plight and despair of the people of Greece. Doctors all over the UK are dismissing patients, telling them that they cost too much to treat. Unusually high mortality rates amongst hospital patients is increasing, including baby deaths. Terminally ill children and the elderly are being dismissed from hospitals and told to die at home under the Pathways to Death scheme. Donations to charities were targeted for tax deductions. Cancer patients and charities were abused and mocked in Parliament. The poor and most vulnerable are being forced out of their homes and in certain areas, feeding the homeless has been banned. Civil Rights have been eradicated and all possible means of recourse have been removed or are under threat. Extra funding has gone into spying on the public and further infringement of Civil Liberties. Right wing extremism is actively being promoted and rationalized.

If there is an increase of people supporting the abandonment and ruthless persecution of the most vulnerable and weakest in society, as the media portrays, this means that the majority of people in the UK are either heartless or indifferent. Either way, it demonstrates a frightening capacity for controlling the masses, which the Tavistock Institute is most likely to be the base of operations and co-ordinated globally by Chatham House (a.k.a. Royal Institute of International Affairs). If heartless, it proves that the will of the human spirit has been systemically broken within a very short period of time, and we are in the process of abandoning our humanity. If indifferent, it means we rely on Government to provide us with `an acceptable level of Evil' to help us alleviate our conscience and sleep better each night, so that we can disavow ourselves of any responsibility. It also means that rather than demanding that our taxes are spent on the poor and vulnerable victims of a banker virus, we would rather them spent on killing children in Iraq, Afghanistan, Gaza, West Bank, Lebanon, Libya and Syria. However, an excuse can always be provided by your Government, which will be rationalized in the minds of many, and one day we will be held to account for our endorsement and what we have allowed in our name. If a day of Judgement is to come, then we may be judged collectively. Denial is the first stage of submission. Silence is a War Crime.


Following the loss of Rupert Murdoch's BSkyB deal, David Cameron needed to urgently regain his control of the media. Having previously worked as a PR man/Spin Doctor and for Carlton TV, he appointed Craig Oliver, a former editor at the BBC as his Communications Director to replace the disgraced Andy Coulson

All the editors of the major press and media were summoned to Downing Street, where Cameron presented them with an ultimatum. Either, they present the news he wants, or they face harsh financial cuts and press passes being withdrawn. Both Craig Oliver and Lynton Crosby were appointed to oversee that these conditions were met and to maintain an illusion of media impartiality for the acceptance of the public. Therefore, any news deemed to have a significant impact on the Government agenda must first be reviewed by Craig Oliver. As part of David Cameron's "Big Society", a sinister organisation was established by the Government to infiltrate all public institutions and dependencies to sabotage and to cause major disruption in order to justify selling them to private investors, such as Goldman Sachs. The NHS (National Health Service) and State Education are just two such examples of areas targeted.  These are typical characteristics of the Illuminati and a replication of their 1776 template for global dominance through infiltration and subversion. In 1776, academics, law, media, clergy, banking, medicine, politics and Freemasonry were among the main objectives, with the latter coinciding with the American War of Independence in order to establish a `nation' as their base of operations, with their sites set on the eastern hemisphere for some future date to create a dichotomy of false ideological paradigms to establish global control and dominance. France was a consideration. However, Russia was to fill this role instead. With the accumulation of all the earths natural resources, including Human Resources, power is to be consolidated into one single entity to control mankind.

"By now, this last point ought to sound frighteningly familiar".





Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 2 January 2012

David Cameron again insults the intelligence of the British people

The sadism of David Cameron truly knows no bounds. He makes this New Year grand speech of spin, feigning his empathy with those in hardship, promising to clamp down on bankers bonuses. This while simultaneously heaping New Years honours and awards on his wealthy gangster buddies, again, and announcing plans to cut the wages of troops on the front line. In addition, this spin is deliberately insulting the intelligence of the people of the UK. Is this evil bastard for real?

Friday, 9 September 2011

Britain For Sale: How the Nazi's Won The War

It is strange how history keeps repeating itself, at least until it gets it right. Napoleon wanted it. Adolf Hitler wanted it. Today, we have a European Central Government in Brussels, just as Napoleon had striven for. Hitler had written Mein Kampf (aka, My Struggle) in which he envisioned a New World Order. Today, it is coming into view, achieved by stealth.

The goal has always been the same, "A One World Government", and what we a re witnessing today is a consolidation of all nations into a Central Banking system for an eventual One World Bank. The only difference today is that the modern Adolf Hitler is David Cameron. He has certainly been keen to demonstrate that he can be much more ruthless and heartless that Tony Blair could ever wished to be when he went to war on a lie that caused thousands of deaths, atrocities and untold suffering for millions of people and future generations. Cameron wants to inflict the suffering closer to home, as he only won the job as unelected PM by demonstrating his willingness for evil.


David Cameron now wishes to force the British people into surrendering its national sovereignty. George Osborn attended a top secret  Bilderberg meeting in St. Moritz, Switzerland in the middle of June 2011, in which he discussed the progress of Britain's surrender. Of course, you won't have heard any of this, since there is always a mainstream media blackout of such clandestine meetings. However, those of us in the alternative media did cover it. 

The analogy was already tried and tested on Ireland. In May 2010, unelected Bilderberg water-carrier David Cameron announces his trigger word, "Big" Society, as a subliminal reference to, Big Brother. Cameron brings back another known Bilderberg member, Tory veteran, Ken Clarke to oversee the transition. In 2008, Ireland overwhelmingly rejected the Lisbon Treaty. This threw the future of the EU into chaos. What is not known, is that the relatively new Irish Premiere, Brian Cowan was then brought before the elites globalist mafia and told in no uncertain terms that he "must go back to Ireland and force the Irish people to think again in another illegally imposed referendum!" Brian Cowan was reminded of the consequences should he not comply. He was already aware of the suspicious political scandal that forced his predecessor, Bertie Ahern to resign. He was reminded of how Ireland came to be the booming "Celtic Tiger" economy of the 1980/90s, and abruptly told, "You don't get a free lunch on the mob, and that if Ireland didn't play along, then all debts would be instantly recalled, `with interest', and that as a further penalty, economic and trade sanctions would be implemented against Ireland, reducing it to little more than a third world country". This gave the global elite bully boys an opportunity to flex their muscles against any other nation who decided to go against them. As a warning, immediately after Irelands original rejection of Lisbon in 2008, the world was suddenly hit with a global recession overnight. This was New World Order blackmail, and the citizens of each nation were being held hostage. Meanwhile, back in Ireland, the corporate controlled media were scare mongering the Irish people into voting for the illegal Lisbon Treaty in 2009 whilst demonising the strong "NO" campaign. Corporations who had established their European headquarters in Ireland, such as Intel and HP, were all threatening to pull out of Ireland if they rejected the treaty. The British people were to be next. During the UK recession, "small banks" were being held up as scapegoats, while they were being robbed by larger banks, especially in light of bonuses. This is a slight diversionary distraction from the truth. When we here talk of "National debt", we automatically assume that it is debt owed to the international community, when it is really to the Bank Of England , which is the main subsidiary to the Rothschild European Central Bank. People rarely ponder upon the idea of whether or not the Chancellor Of The Exchequer or Treasurer are qualified accountants. The simple answer is, they don't need to be, because, it is NOT they who do the sums. It is NOT they who regulates the budget. The very pinnacle of power, those whom you thought you'd voted for don't have any real power, since the Government has to go "cap in hand" to the Bank Of England whenever it wants any money. However, instead of having a national centralised bank, if all nations are combined, then that bank becomes consolidated into a World Bank. All that needs to be done is for the owners of such a bank to persuade the very wealthiest of each nation that they will have a stake and a handsome share if they invest in one bank. However, in reality, they don't have any real choice. So, the persuasion is just a matter of etiquette. The ultimate prize is, control over the masses by a select few. 

"Behold all the kingdoms of the earth. Follow me, and they shall be given unto you!"