What The Chilcot Inquiry did not tell us.... The Bigger Picture

The Chilcot report

The general result of the Chilcot Inquiry was that Tony Blair made mistakes based on flawed intelligence. However, with the Tavistock Institute controlling the mindset of the masses through the mainstream media, people have forgotten the name, "Hans Blix". He was the Swedish diplomat sent into Iraq to look for Saddam's alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction. After an extensive and exhaustive investigation, Mr Blix and his team eventually emerged to announce that they could find no WMD's or evidence of any.

Tony Blair's New World Order dossier

Bush and Blair completely ignored these crucial findings and brushed it under the carpet. The media never mentioned the name of Hans Blix again. Since then, he has been written out of the record. 

It was the fact that Bush and Blair wanted blood so lustfully that they ignored the human will for peace which led me to participate in mobilizing people to take to the streets in London in mass protest. "Two million" of us marched that day, yet the media lied and downgraded this number. As elaborated upon later, thanks to David Cameron, such a demonstration of mass human compassion is no longer possible. When 9/11 provoked the writing of the Apathy Kills blog, it was in anticipation of the new age to come.

 

While the British media responds to the Chilcot Inquiry by focusing on families who lost their loved ones sent to their deaths in Iraq, they conveniently forgot to mention the generations of Iraqis suffering from the horrific effects of depleted uranium which I covered in one of my films. Ever since the war in Iraq, new born babies have been born with grotesque deformities. Depleted uranium does not dissipate. The Gulf war was much more than what the mainstream media portrays today. It was an experiment, and as revealed in Tony Blair’s letters to fellow Freemason, George W. Bush, it was a prelude to their vision of the diabolic New World Order, a concept that the sheeple ignorantly attach to conspiracy theorists. This will still remain the case despite Blair referring to the NWO several times in his letters. Tony Blair is a 33+ member of the 1591 Studholme Masonic Lodge and George W. Bush keeps to the family tradition of membership of the Knights of Eulogia. Blair was only lukewarm as the benchwarmer for the depraved David Cameron, whose atrocities will only come to light long after this generation has gone. Even now, citizens in the west have already forgotten or become completely desensitised to the barbaric plight of millions of refugees. Even now, after announcing his resignation as Prime Minister, the sociopathic behavior of David Cameron could not resist one parting shot as he casually announced this week that he was sending British armed forces to strategic positions to provoke Vladimir Putin and increase the likelihood of a nuclear war with Russia. However, few people will have heard this news as the mainstream media will have played it down and the population of the UK will be completely oblivious to its significance. Creating an age of “Apathy” towards the despair and suffering of others was David Cameron’s remit and by his redefining of morals and ethics we can exonerate ourselves of any guilt as a New World Oder society. In such a new age, “Freedom means protecting us from what is done in our name” by not having to be informed about it. Perhaps one day, we will be held to account for our complicity through indifference and for allowing the new age of immorality that David Cameron presided over to corrupt a `new generation of nobody cares'.

Is David Cameron Preparing a False Flag Terror Incident To Win Election?

We should already be more than accustomed to the depths of depravity that David Cameron will stoop in order to ruthlessly exploit, manipulate and deceive the typically malleable and gullible British public. It is already known that the 2010 May General election was rigged. Since then we have witnessed the falsification of economic figures, unemployment figures, opinion polls. We have witnessed censorship, gagging charities, threats to the media and his disgraceful defence of corrupt and paedophile members of his own party. We have witnessed the media being bullied into the complicity of cover-ups and publicizing the news he wants (Editors are appointed and removed by those in power to do just that, `edit' the news. See CFR takeover of global media in 1917). Ever since he lost the BSkyB deal with Rupert Murdoch, the renowned vindictive and spiteful David Cameron has been hell bent on compensating by forcing the media to do his bidding. Since 2010, we have witnessed for the first time in modern British politics a Prime Minister vitriolically express viciously abusive personal insults to his opponents while debating in parliament. We have witnessed the greatest divisions the UK has ever known in its history. And yet, despite all the evidence and the glaringly obvious, an oblivious and docile British public disturbingly remain in denial and indifferent. How many of us are individually aware of how our perceptions of global events and human relations has radically changed since 2010? Have we failed to recognise how much we have been malleably subdued?

To this end, there was something very unusual and sinister about the Channel 4 News broadcast on Wednesday 18 June, which has remained since. Although in varying formats, the same distinct pattern was applied to all major UK TV News networks, suggesting deception by design and a predetermined agenda that came right out of the clandestine Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. At this point I should point out that when journalists start interviewing people representing what are known as "Think Tanks" we should treat with caution, since this coded term is a clear indication of a Shadow Government intervention decided upon at the preceding highly secret Bilderberg meetings and that these people represent the sinister and clandestine Tavistock Institute or Chatham House (a.k.a. the Council on Foreign Relations, CFR, which is the modern version of the 18th Century Illuminati) The `crafted' script for the evening news sounded well-defined, as if it had been personally written by David Cameron's thugs themselves, Craig Oliver and Lynton Crosby. Watch the choreography of the entire news bulletin and the chronology of each news story. There was a very distinct touch of Déjà vu, reminiscent of 2003 and Tony Blair's great lie that Saddam Hussein's armoury of chemical weapons was on standby for a strike on the UK within 45 minutes, despite the findings of UN weapons inspector Hans Blix reporting the contrary that Saddam had no such weapons. Coincidentally, the name, Hans Blix was conveniently written out of the history books following his findings, since few today will even remember him.  Habitual and Consummate liar, David Cameron is almost mimicking Blair's "ipso facto" 2003 speech, which sparked the Iraq invasion. Today, Cameron categorically states that "ISIS" `are' planning to attack Britain. Lest we forget, until only last week, nobody had ever even heard of the Al-Queda renegade faction and as already proven, Al-Queda (a.k.a. Database) is a cover for the CIA and does not exist. ISIS/ISIL quite literally emerged overnight, coincidentally as David Cameron's friend was sworn in as the new Egyptian President, which will be elaborated upon later. Notice too how on `three' occasions, the Channel 4 News Home Affairs Correspondent, Darshna Soni stated that an alleged jihadist terrorist suspect `specifically' told her of his intentions to join ISIS, yet she failed to present any evidence of this, not a recorded interview nor even a quote. This in itself is a violation of journalistic integrity. Her deliberate soundbite again seems decisively crafted. Remember, her claim is highly unlikely since the name ISIS only suddenly arrived on the mainstream news within the last two weeks at the latest.

Notice too in the crafted chronology of the Channel 4 News, Cathy Newman's ridiculously desperate claim that "ISIS is fighting cyber war on social media", then just a couple of days later an alleged ISIS recruitment video appears and is quickly circulated throughout the media. How many of us have spotted the familiar patterns by the release of this video? This would almost certainly be seen to justify the radical enforcement of the master of coincidence, David Cameron's Snoopers Charter, Censorship and the Gagging law. In another conveniently linked news story Cathy Newman then goes on to vent a savage character assassination of WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, again deliberately emphasizing defaming soundbites, twice stating how much Mr Assange is costing tax payers. She then goes on to add the remark that supporters of Julian Assange are increasingly becoming disillusioned. Where did that come from? Note the absence of a survey or poll as evidence.

In 2003, Tony Blair lied to justify committing allied forces to a war in Iraq. As a result his leadership began to falter, and he faced losing the next general election. However, on 7 July 2005, the London bombings killed 52 people and injured more than 770, 300 seriously. This acted as a distraction and boosted Blair's election hopes. Tony Blair and close friend of David Cameron, George Bush were attending a G8 summit at Gleneagles in Scotland on the morning of the blasts. A news outlet in Israel reported that a visiting Israeli politician had been warned and asked to stay in his London hotel room. Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks. However, police later denied any such warning.

CIA asset Tim Osman, a.k.a. Osama Bin Laden

David Cameron has learned some very valuable lessons from his bench warmer, Tony Blair, including

his characterization as "Teflon Tony", since the same sentiment can certainly be attached to Cameron. By contrast, Cameron's atrocities have been much worse than his. The only difference is that the actions of Blair were much more in the public domain, as 2 million demonstrators took to the streets of London in protest against the war in Iraq. David Cameron skillfully managed to avoid attracting such devastating attention. Cameron's War Crimes were much more subtle, as immediately upon entering Downing Street, he sent British special forces into Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria and later, Somalia to destabilize the whole Arab region in what the media dubbed the Arab Spring and which also provided a huge market for the former Arms Dealer and baby killer to sell arms on behalf of the arms industry who placed him in power in 2010, as revealed by the Liam Fox scandal. Yet again, the very name, Liam Fox has been written out of the history books, as few today will even remember who he was. And following the removal of Gaddafi in Libya, Cameron also removed the lifeline and relative stability to the African continent that Gaddafi provided. The people who chose David Cameron wanted someone immoral who would not be hampered by conscience and could appear to be charming and even seductive while sociopathic and sadistically depraved.

Coincidentally, David Cameron's first port of call during his arms sales tour was a visit to Egypt after its first wave of instability. The person he was there to meet was none other than, Egypt's former military chief "Abdel Fattah el-Sisi" who was sworn in as Egypt's new President on Sunday 8 June 2014, thus guaranteeing further instability in the region and generating huge profits for the profiteer of misery himself. Is it just yet another coincidence that a new threat, (ISIS) has just emerged almost exactly at the same time as Mr Cameron's new friend takes power in Egypt?

BE PREPARED

The people of the UK ought to be on high alert at this particular time, not due only to a possible False Flag incident, but more so in preparation for another rigged general election in 2015 to keep David Cameron in power. 

For crucial information see the Hegelian Dialectic

AND

Confessions of an Economic Hitman

Related articles

• Tony Blair to sue David Cameron over plagiarising of his 2003 work of fiction 'War Scenario'
• Is David Cameron our prime minister, or just a travelling arms merchant?
• Prime Minister David Cameron takes arms dealers to Egypt to promote democracy
• Inside Uk
• UK Promoting Democracy or Selling Wars & Terrorism
• Cameron, weapons dealer turns peace maker
• Owen Paterson and David Cameron's dodgy dossier hiding the real health catastrophe of fracking
• Hard Proof of Staging in Iraqi Massacre Hoax

David Cameron & Syria: A Sadistic Bloodthirsty Demon In Our Midst - Please Wake Up

So-called Syrian rebels follow familiar barbaric patterns throughout Arab Spring. Script prepared on behalf of so-called Free Syrian Army

As demonstrated throughout this blog, we know by now that the Arab Spring, as it became known was instigated by David Cameron, almost immediately upon his `installment' into Government by the UK arms industry. However, the media has kept us distracted long enough to overlook the part of "Mr Coincidence" in the Arab regions. This is aided by a determined effort to avoid the same public outcry as Cameron's bench-warmer, Tony Blair provoked. With this in mind, instead of committing British military forces on the ground, as War Criminal, Tony Blair did in Iraq, Cameron surreptitiously had British special forces sent into the region to ignite instability and arm proxy rebel fighters. This had been reported on UK mainstream media news from the onset as British intelligence operatives were apprehended in Tunisia, prior to the overthrow of President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali. Similar news stories emerged afterwards in Egypt, where British Government agents were caught again in preparation for the overthrow of President Mubarak. The same pattern was repeated throughout the whole region, with a bloodthirsty David Cameron strategically visiting each conquered Arab territory in the aftermath of the bloodshed, with his arms teams tagging along to sell British made weapons. 

In the subsequent horror that followed, it has become incrementally safe for the mainstream media to refer to the manufactured proxy rebel fighters as "foreigners", `only' because they are drawn from a database of former Mujahideen and other fundamentalist groups that the CIA (a.k.a. Cocaine Import Agency) used in other covert operations in places such as Afghanistan, Bosnia and Kosovo. This database is better known in its Arabic translation, "Al-Qaeda", and they are the same people sent in to destabilize each region, from Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and now Syria, funded, as we know, by the British Government.

These proxy rebel fighters follow a familiar traditional pattern of barbaric depravity, as demonstrated in my films. We have previously seen what they do to captured Government defence forces in all the aforementioned regions. Commonly repeated horrific scenes have been public hangings, beheadings, prisoners tortured, organs cut out and trampled on, limbs being hacked off with machetes, children being mutilated in Sirte, Libya in David Cameron's determination to capture and execute Gaddafi. (WARNING: These films do contain disturbing and distressing scenes.)

How much more will it take to show the British public what kind of demonic sadistic psychopath they have in Government? How much longer are we going to tolerate people making excuses for an increasingly depraved society? Ten years ago there would have been national public outrage if anyone had so much as even taunted someone who had some form of disability or illness. It would have been regarded as cruelly immoral, unethical and inhumane and totally unacceptable. Today, amid a deliberate erosion of compassion, we adjust it to make it more palatable for acceptance.

The gradual destruction of the NHS to `sacrifice' patients in order to justify selling it to Goldman Sachs, as arranged on 15 March 2012