David Cameron's Nazi Britain police state just around the corner

The sadistic Face of Evil

Is there no depths of utter evil that David Cameron will stoop to? The cruelest evil is when we try to justify it. How much are we going to allow Cameron to get away with his depravity, as he is given a platform to convince us all that evil is good and that good is evil. If he were to bring in a policy of butchering children, the likes of Channel 4 News would give him the platform to promote and justify it.

Today, this sickening, heartless piece of scum delighted in sending children to jail for stealing something as little as a bottle of water during the recent riots. While the riots should be condemned, Cameron saw it as another sickening opportunity to target the most vulnerable. He isn't happy enough with pouring misery upon the seriously ill and dying, persecuting the disabled, throwing old aged pensioners out of care homes so that he can sell them to his greedy wealthy buddies. He now wants to target single mothers and their children. What is even worse is, that Cameron will seize on any opportunity to inflict Nazi Britain onto a sleeping British public. Now, he is setting his sights on censoring FREE SPEECH. Some of these rioters were sent to jail for expressing their frustrations on Facebook.

Let us not forget why the riots started, which the overtly Nazi Coalition supported media, Channel 4 News and the BBC, take pains to divert our attention from. The police, yet again murdered an innocent man in London. Today, again they murdered another young man in Cumbria with a taser. Of course, Channel 4 News, with The Fool, aka Jon (Goebals) Snow, as their anchorman will as usual deceive you into thinking that there will be an Independent investigation into the increasing deaths at the hands of the police. When was the last time you heard of any heavy convictions for killer cops?

I urge you to keep an close eye on Channel 4 News, just to see for yourselves how obviously bias and extremely right wing they truly are. I have been keeping a record over recent years which demonstrates of how outrageously in favour this so-called News channel are of right wing politics.

And, in case anyone tries to accuse the author of this article as, in any way representing Labour Party views, Blair should never be forgotten or forgiven for the slaughter of children in Iraq and his betrayal of students among other things. Neither should Brown, nor Clegg for his cowardly treason. However, Cameron takes evil to a more sadistically overt and extreme level.

David Cameron is Evil

David Cameron and his cruel, heartless, draconian policies undoubtedly to blame for riots

The 1980s all over again

Axis of Evil

As usual it is always the innocent who suffer most in violence and conflict. It was heartbreaking to see that people had lost their homes and worldly possessions at the hands of thugs. Some only had the clothes they wore, without any hope of ever getting back on their feet again. However, they can expect little sympathy from Cameron, who has proven beyond a doubt that he views the poor and vulnerable with utter contempt, while he rewards his wealthy buddies for thieving from the public, such as Centrica (British Gas) chairman Roger Carr. His honour for services to business was to axe the jobs of hundreds of Cadbury staff and to hike up fuel prices by 7% just in time for the Arctic winter to hit hard-up families struggling to pay heating bills. This is exactly the kind of thing that has provoked these disturbances. The first thing that Cameron did was to target the hardest hit victims of a recession, the poor and weak in society and cruelly used them as scapegoats.

Some of the kids rioting expressed genuine reasons for their frustrations and despair, yet we get so-called newspapers like the Daily Mail and Daily Express dangerously antagonizing them to score political points for the Nazi Coalition. 

People need wake up and be prepared to face some home truths. The UK only seems to experience civil unrest and instability every time there is a Tory Government, and as we have all seen, David Cameron and George Osborn take delight in their unrelenting viciousness. Osborn clearly displayed how he thinks the people of he UK are too stupid, when he smugly blamed the bad weather for the economy over the Christmas period, and unbelievably, many bought it.

While we must sympathize completely when officers become victims of violence, over recent times we cannot fail to notice how the further encroachment of a police state has contributed to pushing people over the edge.

Is Cameron Funding Al-Qaeda?

Cameron: Screw the elderly, poor, vulnerable and  the British people. I want my war in Libya for that Oil and Gold.

Does this front page story on the Daily Mirror ring any bells or sound remotely familiar? If not, that's because the mainstream corporate media has distracted you from it, over years of carefully constructed soundbites.

What you also may forget is David Cameron's almost obsessive lust for war ever since his imposition a year ago. Let me just present a summary of Mr Cameron's criminal record from his early years as a Bullingdon Club member at Oxford University, kicking and abusing street beggars, telling them to get a job, to his expressed contempt for Asda workers during another of his carefully staged and choreographed visits to gloat in telling people how he intended screwing up their futures and blaming the "global" recession on the last Labour Government. To demonstrate his contempt, Cameron even commissioned a voyeuristic study to gauge the happiness factor of the British people, as a result of him robbing them to to feed his wealthy buddies. He wanted to see how miserable he could make us, so that he could watch us suffer.

As Cameron received his instructions from the Bilderberg Group meeting and under the guidance of veteran Bilderberg member, Ken Clarke, he began by his timely visit to India to blast Pakistan as a "Terrorist State". This was while the people of Pakistan were suffering cataclysmic floods, killing and displacing thousands. Of course, this is to be expected from a renowned cruel, heartless, sadistic bully. The anticipated result of the generated apathy was a media blackout of Pakistans suffering, severely restricting and almost eliminating charitable aid, while we were distracted to the high spirited story of a bunch of trapped cheerful Chilean miners, only to be followed up by another cruel blow to Pakistan by the coverage a dumb Pakistan cricketing scandal, while thousands were dieing. All this while David Cameron was telling the British people that they "shouldn't rely on the state" (aka, diplomatic for "Screw you"). Amazingly, nobody picked up on this and reminded him that, "Err. Prime Minister. That is the role, function and entire purpose of Government, to Serve The People".

Mission accomplished, the transparent Cameron's rhetoric begins to turn to war, as he can barely contain his excitement, as he itches for another Iraq. High on his priority is Libya. Having his desires abundantly made obvious by his almost immediate visit to Egypt following the alleged uprising, he seized the opportunity to secure arms sales to Egypt (again, not picked up by the mainstream media).

Then came the Libya/Gadaffi rhetoric, spin and soundbites. Count the many references to Gadaffi slaughtering civilians. Is any of this starting to sound familiar yet?

Cameron is caught out on a major cock up, when his inpatients for war gets the better of him and he sends a bumbling team of special forces into the region. He then tells us that there will be no feet on the ground in Libya, while we already knew that the SAS were already there working with CIA/Al-Qaeda (aka, database) operatives. 

Top Ranking CIA Operatives Admit Al-qaeda Is a Complete Fabrication

It is sometimes difficult to know who to be more frustrated with, them or the viewing public who buy the the obvious bullshit being spoon fed to them everyday and they foolishly believe it. So, the question is, "How would you feel if you knew that David Cameron was using your money to fund Al-Qaeda to overthrow Gadaffi?" Which is more outrageous, this suggestion or the fact that it is true? Would you be surprised to know that it has happened more often than you'd care to think and that there is documented and declassified evidence to support this claim, going as far back as 1953 Iran. It is the exact same template that has been used ever since then being applied today. In 2006, Tony Gosling posted an article on Bilderberg.org, entitled Robin Cook: A motive for murder by MI6. The article revealed that the then foreign secretary Robin Cook was investigating claims by an Ex MI5 whistleblower that British Intelligence had paid Islamic fanatics £100,000 in 1996 to assassinate Colonel Gaddafi. Initially, Robin Cook was skeptical, and almost immediately, the corporate media sought to discredit the source of the information, but in subsequent investigations, more hard evidence began to emerge, which eventually led him to resign from the Government over the Iraq War. However, since it has now been revealed through a bumbling operation by British Intelligence that they were indeed in Libya at the start of the current instability, then we can hardly dismiss such allegations, especially since we now see a familiar pattern repeat itself. After his resignation, Robin Cook began working for The Guardian, where he wrote an article on what he'd uncovered:

Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.

As I have covered in my other posts, it can hardly be coincidence that each region in North Africa began to topple almost simultaneously, since the timing exposes order, indicating that it is clearly by design, with the end goal being Global Government, as nations throughout the world fall over like dominoes, losing their national sovereignty to eternal debt. The wealthy North African nations had their own independent central banks, with their own sovereign national currency. Of course, the likes of Gadaffi and Mubarak are tyrants, placed in their luxurious positions by the West. However, they'd forgotten that they were only contract caretakers to be terminated at a certain time. What the corporate media won't tell you is that despite Gadaffis links to terrorism, he was good to his people. History shows that when this happens, the CIA get very irritable, as told in John Perkins, "Confession Of An Economic Hit man", a copy of which can be viewed in my related posts.

Update: Yahoo quickly removes HAARP evidence of Japan quake headline

After they realized they'd published a Jane Standley, Yahoo! quickly removes video from their homepage. The classic HAARP signature was filmed over the latest earthquake to hit Japan. Once Yahoo! had realised they had let the cat out of the bag, they quickly removed it. Moments later, they replaced it with an earlier news story, omitting the incriminating "Mystery light over earthquake" story completely. When HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme) is active, it emits an aurora borealis effect over the skyline. The reason I call this a "Jane Standley" is because while the BBC journalist was reporting the ongoing events of 9/11, she was telling the world that the Salomon building (Building 7) had collapsed, it was still standing in the background. It didn't fall for almost half an hour afterwards, indicating obvious fore knowledge.  When the BBC realised the gaff, they quickly pulled the feed to Jane Standley in New York midway through the interview. They later tried to blame it on a technical problem. Channel 4 News (UK) made the same gaff recently, when they announced that instability would ensue in the Arab region after the Tunisia uprising. Soon afterwards, each region began falling like dominoes, the same effect as the designed global economic recession. Of course, the Arab revolutions could easily be dismissed as journalistic forecasting of trends, but that's highly unlikely and unrealistic. All of these regions refused to allow the takeover of the Rothschild Central Bank, (including Libya) the motive behind the Russian Revolution and other global conflicts in the last century.

UPDATE: After removing the headline, Yahoo! moves quickly to replace the story with an earlier one of the Japan earthquake

Libya: Expect Allied Terror False Flag incident by Globalists

As soon as the Cold War ended, did anyone really believe that the CIA and MI5 would become redundant? The mainstream media prevents us from asking the obvious questions, such as, "What are the intelligence services gonna do without an enemy?" Well, they invent one. The arms industry need someone to sell their arms to, so "War" is always big business, as we saw the slimy, David Cameron sneaking off to Egypt to secure arms sales during their revolt. Nobody has bothered to ask what were MI5 doing there? The obvious answer is, to secure instability in the region, although don't expect your news correspondents to reveal that to you either. Nobody has bothered to ask about what an overwhelming coincidence it was that every Arab region should become destabilized at the same time overnight and how?? The reason why nobody has asked is because if enough distractions are thrown in front of you, you won't care, such as the designed Global recession, and the surrender of each nations sovereignty to the World Bank, as they topple one after the other. "Keep avoiding the pattern, and you'll go blind!" The Rothschild and Rockefeller CIA and others specialise in regime change. Starve a nations people of its natural resources and impose hidden sanctions, and you'll have a revolution. When the Rothschild/Rockefeller installed leader flees the country with all the gold, he's stopped at the CIA/MI5/Mossad checkpoint en route, and relieved of it, to be deposited in the World Bank for the Globalist elite.

So, while we sit down each evening for our daily intake of lies and deception, we are so force fed and conditioned that nobody remembers the initial basic questions. We have yet to hear the mainstream media inform us of what happened to Mubarak. After both he and the toppled Tunisian leader fled, both had strokes, according to our daily news "one off report". Again, we are diverted and distracted from asking such probing questions. Of course, there's no doubt that Gadaffi is a tyrant. However, why aren't we being kept informed of the other ruthless tyrants in the around the world, who are "slaughtering" their own people. Again, it's because, these tyrants are UN allies, so they can butcher as many civilians as they want.

While we eventually became aware of the fact that the staged Iraqi war was over oil, many of us took to the streets of London in protest. However, on this particular occasion, the cries of descent can barely be heard, because our apathy has been conditioned to a shrugging of the shoulders, with the quiet mumbling of, "Here we go again, yawn, yawn!"

How it works: 

The Rothschild/Rockefeller funded CIA would destroy the infrastructure of a particular region or target its natural resources. The Economic Hitman would then be despatched to meet the regions leader to negotiate a restoration of the country's resources, thus inviting in US and UK corporate investment. Arms and military support would also be on offer to keep the restless and suffering population at bay. If the price for this restoration package is too high, then civil unrest and instability would naturally occur. If the country's leader resisted, the western intelligence agencies would generate negative propaganda against the leader, while the seeds of revolution are firmly planted, thus feeding the military industrial complex. A rogue dictator would then be installed, who would seize control of all the country's natural resources and hand it over to huge corporations who would then sell it back to the people at a higher price for a profit. Eventually, when oil, gold and cocaine are no longer profitable, people become the next resource. So, if you want to know the "truth" about what is really going on in Iraq, Afghanistan and more recently in the Arabic regions.

So, what can we expect next?

If the globalists don't get what they want, they orchestrate a "False Flag". For example, while we lose count of how many times Cameron uses the soundbite of, Gadaffi "slaughtering/targeting innocent civilians", it may become apparent that this is NOT true. Therefore, a major event may be staged to justify the invasion of Libya or other Arab nation. So, expect a major staged terrorist incident soon. In the meantime, keep your ears peeled for the media rhetoric and jargon, as that ought to be a clue.

So, when you see David Cameron and Nick Clegg mourn the death of another soldier in Afghanistan or Iraq, remember that it was these bastards who murdered that kid, by denying him a decent job, dole money and now an education, when he left school, forcing him into the military for a miserable £15k. Remember, when you see Cameron sneaking off to places like Egypt, he's selling British made arms to kill your children. But, then again, you can always just tell yourself, "Hey. That's just business!"

"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." - Globalist, Henry Kissinger

Egypt: The latest developments in Egypt has "CIA" written all over it!!

Is it just a coincidence that just after Rockefeller mouthpiece, Henry Kissinger appears on a TV interview to talk about the crisis in Egypt, that pro-Mubarak supporters suddenly show up? Where were these pro-Government supporters before now? On Monday evening, Channel 4 News interviewed two of them in a Cairo alleyway, frightened to appear on the streets because there are virtually no Mubarak supporters. Now, we're expected to believe that suddenly there are thousands of them? People must stop listening to the corporate media garbage. They won't tell you about the familiar signs of CIA involvement, but they will distract you from even noticing.

In my last post, I said that the reason why Mubarak was stalling for so long and refusing to go was because he'd just been on the phone to Hilary Clinton, telling him that he wouldn't receive safe passage out of Egypt until he'd safeguarded and plundered all of  national wealth and handed it over at the CIA checkpoint en-route to his private hideaway. This is no conspiracy theory. In previous posts and throughout my blog, I've offered countless supporting evidence, including my references to The Confessions of an Economic Hitman, that this whole situation in the region absolutely wreaks of CIA. They've been hiring rent-a-mobs to destabilize nations globally since Iran in 1951. They even tried it in Cuba in an attempt to overthrow Castro, and notoriously in the other Latin American regions, including some where the leaders were loved by the people. I could quote many examples of CIA fingerprints.

Last night, Channel 4 News posed the question of who would replace Mubarak, adding the name of one possibility that the US would favour. Again, this is yet another attempt at predictive programming by the corporate media. Either that, or they've completely missed the point of the revolution. If the people of Egypt "choose" a new leader, then the last thing they want is another US puppet or even anyone remotely pliable to them. The Egyptian people demand a non secular leader for all the people, not one who is  self serving, arrogantly believing he is acting in their best interests, who can be manipulated and exploited by the US on behalf of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. In order for them to achieve this, they must ensure that any new regime DOES NOT allow a Rothschild central bank in Egypt and that any trade agreements are fully endorsed by the people, for the people. It is the self determination of the people that the elites despise most of all.

After Tunisia, familiar CIA trademarks now seen in Egypt to implement the NWO

Update: If you want to know what's really going on in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, and where is likely to be next, just research which regions in the world that don't have any Rothschild banks, and you'll soon smell the stench of CIA. Please, don't be so easily deceived by the corporate media and the likes of evil CFR member, Hilary Clinton. I will cover the Clinton's in a later post...

Here we go again. Looking at the latest scenes of civil unrest in Egypt, we need hardly be surprised, since the corporate, CFR run media, had already prepped us, following the events in Tunisia. If anyone had read my last post, you'll already know that this was coming. So, be prepared for more instability and chaos in the surrounding Arabic regions.

David Atlee Philips

The first step is to prime the mainstream media for the predictive programming of the viewing gullible masses. And, of course we've already seen this with the "scripted rhetoric" from the likes of the Fool, (aka, UK Channel 4 News, Jon Snow) and every other Rockefeller CFR (Counsel on Foreign Relations) run mainstream media outlet, following exactly the same script, proposing that following the (CIA staged) revolt in Tunisia, other surrounding Arab regions may follow, Que Egypt. Surely, it would take a fool not to predict this, as we can expect more. This is the same age old familiar signature of the CIA and a Rothschild favourite, as history documents. They've been using the same tactics since the early 1950s. They applied it to Iran in 1951, as the man who orchestrated the assassination of JFK proudly boasted (David Atlee Phillips, aka Maurice Bishop). Following their success in Iran, the agency, under the direction of brothers, John Foster & Alan Dulles, applied exactly the same tactics throughout regions in Latin American.  Such operations are a matter of recorded history and since, declassified.

Student protests

SINCE THE STUDENT DEMONSTRATIONS IN LONDON OVER TUITION FEES TO FEED THE THIEVING BANKERS & ENERGY COMPANIES, AND ALSO THE SITUATION IN IRELAND, WE MUST ALL FOCUS OUR ATTENTION ON THE ORIGINS OF THE PROBLEM.

IF WE WANT REVOLUTION, WE MUST KNOW WHO ARE TARGETS ARE AND WHAT WE DEMAND FOR JUSTICE. "REVOLUTION" MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO BECOME AN EMPTY RHETORIC PAINTED ONTO A WALL. YOU CAN RESPECT YOUR ENEMY, BUT NOBODY RESPECTS A TRAITOR, AND THAT IS WHY NICK CLEGG HAS EARNED HIS PLACE IN HISTORY. HE SAYS IN HIS DEFENSE HE HAS NO CHOICE. THE TRUTH IS, HE'S ACTUALLY RIGHT, BECAUSE IT IS "NOT" THE GOVERNMENT WHO CALLS THE SHOTS. IT IS THE BANK OF ENGLAND. DO YOUR OWN HISTORICAL RESEARCH OR FOR A QUICK SUMMARY, VISIT MY WEBSITE: http://www.ggordontowerofbabel.co.cc/MyMediaPage.htm