We should already be more than accustomed to the depths of depravity that David Cameron will stoop in order to ruthlessly exploit, manipulate and deceive the typically malleable and gullible British public. It is already known that the 2010 May General election was rigged. Since then we have witnessed the falsification of economic figures, unemployment figures, opinion polls. We have witnessed censorship, gagging charities, threats to the media and his disgraceful defence of corrupt and paedophile members of his own party. We have witnessed the media being bullied into the complicity of cover-ups and publicizing the news he wants (Editors are appointed and removed by those in power to do just that, `edit' the news. See CFR takeover of global media in 1917). Ever since he lost the BSkyB deal with Rupert Murdoch, the renowned vindictive and spiteful David Cameron has been hell bent on compensating by forcing the media to do his bidding. Since 2010, we have witnessed for the first time in modern British politics a Prime Minister vitriolically express viciously abusive personal insults to his opponents while debating in parliament. We have witnessed the greatest divisions the UK has ever known in its history. And yet, despite all the evidence and the glaringly obvious, an oblivious and docile British public disturbingly remain in denial and indifferent. How many of us are individually aware of how our perceptions of global events and human relations has radically changed since 2010? Have we failed to recognise how much we have been malleably subdued?
To this end, there was something very unusual and sinister about the Channel 4 News broadcast on Wednesday 18 June, which has remained since. Although in varying formats, the same distinct pattern was applied to all major UK TV News networks, suggesting deception by design and a predetermined agenda that came right out of the clandestine Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. At this point I should point out that when journalists start interviewing people representing what are known as "Think Tanks" we should treat with caution, since this coded term is a clear indication of a Shadow Government intervention decided upon at the preceding highly secret Bilderberg meetings and that these people represent the sinister and clandestine Tavistock Institute or Chatham House (a.k.a. the Council on Foreign Relations, CFR, which is the modern version of the 18th Century Illuminati) The `crafted' script for the evening news sounded well-defined, as if it had been personally written by David Cameron's thugs themselves, Craig Oliver and Lynton Crosby. Watch the choreography of the entire news bulletin and the chronology of each news story. There was a very distinct touch of Déjà vu, reminiscent of 2003 and Tony Blair's great lie that Saddam Hussein's armoury of chemical weapons was on standby for a strike on the UK within 45 minutes, despite the findings of UN weapons inspector Hans Blix reporting the contrary that Saddam had no such weapons. Coincidentally, the name, Hans Blix was conveniently written out of the history books following his findings, since few today will even remember him. Habitual and Consummate liar, David Cameron is almost mimicking Blair's "ipso facto" 2003 speech, which sparked the Iraq invasion. Today, Cameron categorically states that "ISIS" `are' planning to attack Britain. Lest we forget, until only last week, nobody had ever even heard of the Al-Queda renegade faction and as already proven, Al-Queda (a.k.a. Database) is a cover for the CIA and does not exist. ISIS/ISIL quite literally emerged overnight, coincidentally as David Cameron's friend was sworn in as the new Egyptian President, which will be elaborated upon later. Notice too how on `three' occasions, the Channel 4 News Home Affairs Correspondent, Darshna Soni stated that an alleged jihadist terrorist suspect `specifically' told her of his intentions to join ISIS, yet she failed to present any evidence of this, not a recorded interview nor even a quote. This in itself is a violation of journalistic integrity. Her deliberate soundbite again seems decisively crafted. Remember, her claim is highly unlikely since the name ISIS only suddenly arrived on the mainstream news within the last two weeks at the latest.
In 2003, Tony Blair lied to justify committing allied forces to a war in Iraq. As a result his leadership began to falter, and he faced losing the next general election. However, on 7 July 2005, the London bombings killed 52 people and injured more than 770, 300 seriously. This acted as a distraction and boosted Blair's election hopes. Tony Blair and close friend of David Cameron, George Bush were attending a G8 summit at Gleneagles in Scotland on the morning of the blasts. A news outlet in Israel reported that a visiting Israeli politician had been warned and asked to stay in his London hotel room. Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say
they had received warnings of possible attacks. However, police later denied any such warning.
CIA asset Tim Osman, a.k.a. Osama Bin Laden |
David Cameron has learned some very valuable lessons from his bench warmer, Tony Blair, including
his characterization as "Teflon Tony", since the same sentiment can certainly be attached to Cameron. By contrast, Cameron's atrocities have been much worse than his. The only difference is that the actions of Blair were much more in the public domain, as 2 million demonstrators took to the streets of London in protest against the war in Iraq. David Cameron skillfully managed to avoid attracting such devastating attention. Cameron's War Crimes were much more subtle, as immediately upon entering Downing Street, he sent British special forces into Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria and later, Somalia to destabilize the whole Arab region in what the media dubbed the Arab Spring and which also provided a huge market for the former Arms Dealer and baby killer to sell arms on behalf of the arms industry who placed him in power in 2010, as revealed by the Liam Fox scandal. Yet again, the very name, Liam Fox has been written out of the history books, as few today will even remember who he was. And following the removal of Gaddafi in Libya, Cameron also removed the lifeline and relative stability to the African continent that Gaddafi provided. The people who chose David Cameron wanted someone immoral who would not be hampered by conscience and could appear to be charming and even seductive while sociopathic and sadistically depraved.
The people of the UK ought to be on high alert at this particular time, not due only to a possible False Flag incident, but more so in preparation for another rigged general election in 2015 to keep David Cameron in power.
Coincidentally, David Cameron's first port of call during his arms sales tour was a visit to Egypt after its first wave of instability. The person he was there to meet was none other than, Egypt's former military chief "Abdel Fattah el-Sisi" who was sworn in as Egypt's new President on Sunday 8 June 2014, thus guaranteeing further instability in the region and generating huge profits for the profiteer of misery himself. Is it just yet another coincidence that a new threat, (ISIS) has just emerged almost exactly at the same time as Mr Cameron's new friend takes power in Egypt?
BE PREPARED
The people of the UK ought to be on high alert at this particular time, not due only to a possible False Flag incident, but more so in preparation for another rigged general election in 2015 to keep David Cameron in power.