THE NEPHILIM

The Nephilim are the Children that Resulted from the Mixture of the Fallen Angels(Sons of God) and the Human Weman(Daughters of Man): And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord. -Genesis 6:1-8 (KJV) The Fallen Angels and the Nephilim were the Main Cause for the Destruction of the Earth in the Flood: Then said the Most High, the Holy and Great One spake, and sent Uriel to the son of Lamech, and said to him: Go to Noah and tell him in my name "Hide thyself!" and reveal to him the end that is approaching: That the whole earth will be destroyed, and a deluge is about to come upon the whole earth, and will destroy all that is on it. And now instruct him that he may escape and his seed may be preserved for all the generations of the world. -The Book Of Enoch Chapter X by R.H. Charles. Here is the Reason Why God Sent the Flood: And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another's flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones. -The Book Of Enoch Chapter VII by R.H. Charles. They began to Corrupt all of God's Creation: Sin Against Animals = Sex/DNA Mixing/Genetic Manipulation "And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish..." They Corrupted Man in every possible way even Teaching them the Arts for Making War: And Azâzêl taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known to them the metals of the earth and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all colouring tinctures. And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways. Semjâzâ taught enchantments, and root-cuttings, Armârôs the resolving of enchantments, Barâqîjâl taught astrology, Kôkabêl the constellations, Ezêqêêl the knowledge of the clouds, Araqiêl the signs of the earth, Shamsiêl the signs of the sun, and Sariêl the course of the moon. And as men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven... -The Book Of Enoch Chapter VIII by R.H. Charles. Source: http://ift.tt/1aBbxzw

Fallen Angels Nephilim // Unexplained Mysteries

The Nephilim were offspring of the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men" before the Deluge according to Genesis 6:4; the name is also used in reference to giants who inhabited Canaan at the time of the Israelite conquest of Canaan according to Numbers 13:33. A similar biblical Hebrew word with different vowel-sounds is used in Ezekiel 32:27 to refer to dead Philistine warriors. LA Marzulli - Fallen Angels Nephilim // Unexplained Mysteries. The Brown-Driver-Briggs Lexicon gives the meaning of Nephilim as "giants." Many suggested interpretations are based on the assumption that the word is a derivative of Hebrew verbal root n-ph-l "fall." Robert Baker Girdlestone argued the word comes from the Hiphil causative stem, implying that the Nephilim are to be perceived as "those that cause others to fall down." LA Marzulli - Fallen Angels Nephilim // Unexplained Mysteries. Adam Clarke took it as a perfect participle, "fallen," "apostates." Ronald Hendel states that it is a passive form "ones who have fallen," equivalent grammatically to paqid "one who is appointed" (i.e., overseer), asir, "one who is bound," (i.e., prisoner) etc. According to the Brown-Driver-Briggs Lexicon, the basic etymology of the word Nephilim is "dub[ious]," and various suggested interpretations are "all very precarious." LA Marzulli - Fallen Angels Nephilim // Unexplained Mysteries.

Only a Tory could think they have a right to be corrupt

As former Conservative Party MP, `Sir' Malcolm Rifkind  and Labour MP, Jack Straw face charges over receiving cash for access, a defiant Malcolm Rifkind obviously feels he has the right to be corrupt as he protests that he has done nothing wrong. This is a typical characteristic of the Conservative Party or what has been dubbed the "Self-Servative Party".  Is this what David Cameron meant when the theme of two of his recent party conferences was the endorsement of, "Privilege" followed by another conference where gave a ringing endorsement of "Profit" (through the misery and suffering of others) by his greedy friends and donors?

Are we expected to believe fabricated polls, indicating that this is what the majority of the country wish to vote for? We MUST consider the Tory Party record on falsifying statistics and figures. There is no use to any of us if we just whine and moan about it apathetically. We MUST take action and do more much, much more to force the media to stop supporting false unemployment figures and other lies to falsify a recovering economy.  So, please, if you support what is written here, don't just agree. Do something about it by ramming it down the throats of the mainstream media.

David Cameron's Control of Information and the Cover-ups For his Corrupt and Tax Dodging Friends

WARNING: 2015 UK GENERAL ELECTION TO BE RIGGED

Before reading this article, those more familiar with this blog will know that it is objective in its approach, striving to reveal a much larger picture through recorded and documented evidence, which need not necessarily need to be presented, since it should already be glaringly apparent to most once we are prepared to confront how we have changed in five years. Those who do wish to challenge what they see here should also bear in mind that this blog was conceived in a scathing response to the 2003 illegal war in Iraq. It has focused on the lessons that David Cameron has learned from his bench warmer, Tony Blair. 

Following the May 2010 UK general election a lot of radical changes began to take place, which had as yet an untold devastating impact on the lives of millions and it was not confined to the UK, as you will know if you have watched the related films on this blog. Today, in the current climate we are in danger of overlooking the effect and despair on peoples lives for our own selfish reasons. The irony is that it will be our very indifference that may inevitably lead to our own damnation and no one will hear the cries of those who thought themselves immune when the human carnage incrementally reaches them and the Devil's PR man prepares a bloody path to his masters throne. People in the UK have forgotten where and what they were before the summer of 2010. They have failed to notice that a part of their humanity has been sadistically eradicated and sacrificed. Those who are aware are in denial, too frightened to admit what they have become, so take refuge in the systemic false rationality provided by a Government run media while a heavy tombstone is placed over the burial chamber of compassion, which is to be forgotten and abandoned.

Tory donor shares profits of misery with David Cameron

Shortly after the 2010 General Election, a national survey was produced confirming that most people claimed that they did not know of anyone who had voted for the Conservative Party. Ironically, yet sadly it may well have been the last honest and truthful statistic before being radically corrupted by today's  Eugenicist British Government.
Let's just get this into perspective. Immediately upon David Cameron's rigged election, the Arab Spring began, netting huge profits for the British arms industry. At this point it is important to stress that Mr Cameron is no stranger to arms dealing. Remember the Mark Thatcher scandal in South Africa when he and David Cameron lost a nuclear war head? Are our memories really so short? Remember the Liam Fox scandal? This revealed how it was UK arms dealers who placed David Cameron in power. Remember the news stories in 2010 covering British intelligence units being caught in active service by middle east authorities shortly before the media dubbed Arab Spring began? Remember the news stories covering David Cameron openly flaunting the arms dealers he had in tow during his visit to Egypt following the western orchestrated instability and the violent overthrow of their appointed Hosni Mubarak. We then saw Cameron on his follow up arms trade tour of the whole region.

Old habits never die as David Cameron
profited from dealing Death and Despair

So what other coincidences occurred immediately upon David Cameron's rigged election? Wonga.com was born, owned by venture capitalist, Adrian Beecroft, who is a major Conservative Party donor. It was Beecroft who lobbied Cameron to axe employment law, which included making it possible to sack employees without explanation. David Cameron made a deal with Beecroft that would rake in huge profits for them both. The deal was to sink as many UK citizens as possible into debt, forcing them to borrow, hence the timely creation of Wonga.com. This also meant targeting the most vulnerable victims of a recession, those who lost their jobs, the poor, sick, disabled and terminally ill, all who rely on Government aid. However, withdrawing such critical aid by ruthlessly cutting social welfare would force them to borrow. This generates huge profits in interest for Adrian Beecroft, which he in turn shares with his friend, David Cameron, while also increasing his donations to the Conservative Party. 

How much Tax did she pay on that?

Remember Roger Carr? He was the man who sacked Cadbury's workers and made huge profits for the sale. David Cameron then appointed him as head of Centrica, the company that owns British Gas. It was shortly after David Cameron's rigged election that the hike in energy prices began. David Cameron's reward to Roger Carr for his share of the profit along with many of his donors was to place him on the Queen's New Years Honour's list, earning him the title of "Sir Roger Carr". Recently, the theme of Mr Cameron's party conferences have been a gloating endorsement of "profit" while another was focused on "privilege". Although, there may be reasonable arguments defending profit, none can justify cruelly profiting from the sadistically imposed despair of others. Lest we forget George Osborne's strenuous efforts to prevent the EU from enforcing penalties on Banker Bonuses and on Wednesday 11 February, the Tories voted against cracking down on tax dodging, something the media conveniently failed to report on given the controversy over HSBC. Time and again we've seen them do this, closing ranks to protect the millionaires who bankroll them. The interests of their own come first every time — and everyone else whom the elite clandestinely refer to as `useless eaters' comes second. The list of timely coincidences is endless, but Andy Coulson has been kept out of the media spotlight to disclose all of them, thanks to his replacement, Craig Oliver.

The recession was Global NOT National

David Cameron is known to have been furious at not succeeding in his controversial deal with Rupert Mudoch and BSkyB, which would have secured his control over the mainstream media at a much earlier stage. He has since been determined to make up for the loss at any cost, hence the ruthless exploitation of the Leveson Inquiry, and Mr Cameron has indeed proven himself as a master of deception and exploitation.

Craig Oliver and Lynton Crosby have prevented the mainstream media and anyone else from reporting the truth while they fabricate, falsify and manipulate polls, statistics and facts and figures as well as critical analysis to create the illusion of a recovering economy that nobody else can feel the benefits of. Oliver has relentlessly pursued and bullied the media to the point of raiding the offices of The Guardian newspaper. As Cameron's enforcer, he has vetted, censored and coerced journalists, threatening to withdraw press and media passes to any journalist who asks David Cameron undesirable questions that might not only incriminate him, but would otherwise cause widespread revulsion and shock if certain information was to be released. Newspaper and broadcasting editors have been told to edit their journalists work to certain specifications before being sold to the public. Meanwhile, an oblivious public underestimate the power of a "Director of Communications" who's very role by definition  is to control information. Imagine if a major TV news network were denied a press release from the PM's press office or if priority were given to a competing network or newspaper. This is why former Spin Doctor, David Cameron exploited the Jimmy Savile scandal, threatening to use it to destroy the BBC whom the Tories have always regarded as more favourable to the left. As a a result of the Savile inquiry, those at the top of the BBC were replaced by those more favourable to Cameron and his party. Iain Duncan Smith has relentlessly attacked the BBC, while Channel 4 News have constantly been denied access to Government ministers to answer challenging and controversial questions. Indeed, it should be noted that senior figures and editors throughout the mainstream media have subsequently been replaced by those more favourable to the current Government.

Savile Scandal exploited to appoint Government men to run BBC

Remember Sean Hoare? He was the former News of the World reporter who threatened to expose Cameron's role in the phone-hacking scandal. Hoare was found dead from apparent suicide amid the scandal. Those close to him said that he was terrified of Andy Coulson and the power he wielded as David Cameron's Director of Communications.

Remember Christopher Shale? He was the Chairman for West Oxfordshire Tory Party. He was found dead in a toilet cubicle at the Glastonbury Festival the day after his interview with the Mail On Sunday was published. Significantly in the interview Shale had criticised his own party for being, as he put it: “voracious”, “grasping” and “always seen to be on the take”. His comments on the economy echoed what many felt, that it could not be coincidence that "almost every country in the world was facing economic collapse simultaneously".  David Cameron was said to have been furious with this rising star in the party for his forthrightness. Like many music festivals drugs are rife, particularly the area around the toilet cubicles with the relative privacy they offer. But with upwards of 200,000 people at Glastonbury the area around these toilets isn’t salubrious. In fact hygienically it is literally the pits, with the vast number of people using them. So what was 56-year-old Christopher Shale doing there, particularly when he had a luxury motor home nearby with its own private shower and toilet? To forgo his private toilet facilities to use one of these dirty public cubicles just does not add up. Did this politician with his plans to modernise the Tory Party speak out too loudly and pay with his life? The family of Christopher Shale say they had been told it is almost certain that he died of a heart attack, despite a pathologist being unable to determine an official cause of death.

READ: The Day that David Cameron Sold the NHS

However, after reading this article you may come to the conclusion that it's all just a chronological order of coincidences.

If you have been following this blog, you may remember previous articles as far back as 2010 which have presented a warning predicting that David Cameron was to rig the 2015 general election. 

Craig Oliver bullying a journalist in Downing Street

If the UK public fail to act now, it will mark the beginning of our own downfall by Apathy, for we have failed to recognise the extent of how our own human spirit has been corrupted. The fact is that the UK has never been so divided than it has been in the last five years. The Government has alienated, vilified and scapegoated just about every section of the UK population, from those already previously mentioned, including immigrants and the elderly. It is only a matter of time before they reach you. However, astonishingly there are still some who believe that it will never happen to them and that surely someone will show mercy and come to their aid, neglecting to remember how compassion has been eroded in UK society since 2010. In remaining in denial and in defense of our own fallibility, it is inevitable that some may view what is written here as politically motivated or bias despite this blog being equally critical of Blair's War Crimes in Iraq. In such case, allow me to present a common criticism, "If an `individual' chooses not to vote, they have no say or right to be critical of the democratic process in electing its Government". This common argument is based on the assumption that Government represents the people, in which case we are all complicit in untold mass unquantifiable human suffering and we ought to be damned ashamed of ourselves, since we are complicit by our indifference, ignorance and malleability. It is also based on the assumption that we have a "democratic process". However, if an observer chooses to defend humanity and casts his vote for mankind and for God, that person will be very lonely indeed.

Jack the Ripper

 Jack the Ripper is the best-known name given to an unidentified serial killer who was active in the largely impoverished areas in and around the Whitechapel district of London in 1888. The monicker attached to what became known as `the worlds first serial killer' originated in a letter signed #JacktheRipper, claiming credit for the savage rampage and was propagated by the local newspapers at the time. However, I should point out at this stage that this grisly claim to fame was attributed to American serial killer, H. H. Holmes, who was one of the first documented serial killers in the modern sense of the term. Although Jack is generally referred to as "The Whitechapel Murderer" this is misleading as the term refers to additional murders speculatively attributed to the ripper murders, particularly, Alice McKenzie and Martha Tabram, with the only thing in common being that the suspect was never identified. Between August and November 1888, the Whitechapel area set the stage for the most gruesome murders in criminal history. The five destitute victims were prostitutes, and all except for one - Elizabeth Stride - were horribly mutilated.

-

As an objective researcher I have always challenged any official story of the 1888 Whitechapel murders. The events are what set me on my path as a curious and diligent young man of 15 years old when my father told me about one of the many books he was reading, Jack The Ripper, The Final Solution by Stephen Knight. For an astute teenager it was part of a much larger picture that had to be explored and investigated further. A cabal of now well known authors sprang up as a result of Knights book, all refuting every aspect of his work since his untimely death. This inner circle defensively close ranks at any suggestion of the British Royal family being involved. This is perpetuated by the pompous Victorian empirical view that "NO Englishman would have done these crimes" as  alleged by Sir Robert Anderson, KCB, the second Assistant Commissioner of the London Metropolitan Police, from 1888 to 1901. He laid the blame for the ripper murders squarely at the door of social outcasts of English society, the Polish and the Jews. However, since the clique of so-called experts are so well established, any challenge to them is aggressively rebuked, so their position is well maintained. Yet, it prevents the most obvious and basic questions from being asked, such as, "How could one person elude, deceive and escape perhaps the greatest police force in the world at the time, which is responsible for protecting the mighty British Empire?" Both the Metropolitan police and the City of London police were gravely outsmarted by one man who was so self-confident that he took great risks of being caught in the act of depravity. Not only does that make Jack the Ripper an exceptional human being, but how much more of an exceptionally powerful individual does it make him that he is able to defy several generations and history itself? Yet, these ripperologists as they have become known, would have us believe that the killer was a foreign lunatic. His identity will never be known, only because there are people who won't allow it to be known.

I abandoned the Jack The Ripper Casebook forum some time ago due to its arrogant dependence on the club of alleged experts. You may already be familiar with them. When I challenged them, explaining that Jack could not possibly be one single person and was indeed among a group of individuals, forum members immediately attacked me, ridiculing me for daring to challenge these so-called authors. My challenge was the Mitre Square murder of Katherine Eddowes (aka Mary Kelly as given at the police station she had just been released from). In the short space of approximately five minutes and under the noses of a night watchman and two patrolling police officers and in a pitch black unlit Mitre Square, a single killer managed to lure a victim into the Square, render her unconscious, dissect her body, locate her kidney and finally arrange her body for display, as noted by one of the officers at the scene. The killer even had the audacity to stop and scrawl an obscure chalk message on a wall in Goulston street as he fled the scene, which can reasonably be viewed as deliberately taunting the police. It was the fact that two police officers passed through the Square during their respective beats that one of them came across the body. This indicates that the killer either had a lookout man or that the abduction and mutilation took place elsewhere and the body was dumped in Mitre Square. This theory was also proposed at the scene of the first victim, Mary Ann "Polly" Nichols. The Mitre Square location being chosen for some ritual reason can be supported due to the killer's willingness to risk being caught. By this stage it was obvious that the killer operated in confidence and with impunity. This became most apparent upon the murder of his second victim, Annie Chapman. Again, we are expected to believe that the killer risked taking his victim into a house (29 Hanbury Street) that was filled with tenants and escorted her to the back yard where he performed his grisly act of butchery and mutilation, then take the time to arrange the victims body for display and leave the scene covered in blood. It is difficult to believe that upon the frenzied butchering of five women that nobody witnessed seeing anyone covered in blood near the crime scenes. Instead, yet again we are distracted to make the assumption that the area had several slaughterhouses so it was not uncommon to see bloodstained abattoir worker. Perhaps the reason why there was so little eye witness accounts of such characters is because in each case all the victims were displayed and very little blood was found at the scene, despite the horror of the crime. These facts alone strongly indicate that the crimes were committed elsewhere. Yet, each of the alleged ripper experts today alter the evidence to suit their own agenda as well as their egos and god help anyone who dares to challenge them.

In conclusion these people have perpetuated the myths:

1. Jack the Ripper was a solitary individual.
2. He was a lunatic (probably foreign and Jewish) despite being clever enough to outwit the mighty British Empire, two of the worlds leading police forces and its best detectives and even history itself.
3. The upper classes and especially the British royal family are of high moral standards and ethics and as such are infallible so could possibly be involved in such depraved acts. This is despite their history of sexual decadence and incest.
4. He was just lucky.
5. He was invisible.
6. He had `no' anatomical knowledge despite the evidence clearly indicating otherwise. This claim also contradicts the evidence of other doctors.

In a BBC interview in 1973, an elderly nun at the Providence Row Night Refuge claimed that she had been a novice there in 1915 and was told by an old sister who was there in 1888 that "if it had not been for the Kelly woman, none of the murders would have happened". 

Both these books support this account as does the Jack The Ripper Casebook forum

UFO Documentary - Disclosure 2014 [NEW] HD

via IFTTTIf you would like to talk to like minded people about the GOVERNMENT or like minded issues going on RIGHT NOW visit this FORUM..:. Undeniable UFO Documentary Ufo Disclosure. EBE Award Winner! - International UFO Congress. This film explores the origins of life on earth from the beginning. EBE Award Winner! - International UFO Congress. This film explores the origins of life on earth from the beginning of recorded history, reveals how we view a. Best UFO Sightings Spring 2014 NEW Videos Included Real UFO With Aliens Caught On Camera BEST UFO SIGHTINGS JANUARY 2014 Best UFO Sightings Of January 2014, .