Friday, 28 January 2011

After Tunisia, familiar CIA trademarks now seen in Egypt to implement the NWO

Update: If you want to know what's really going on in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, and where is likely to be next, just research which regions in the world that don't have any Rothschild banks, and you'll soon smell the stench of CIA. Please, don't be so easily deceived by the corporate media and the likes of evil CFR member, Hilary Clinton. I will cover the Clinton's in a later post...

Here we go again. Looking at the latest scenes of civil unrest in Egypt, we need hardly be surprised, since the corporate, CFR run media, had already prepped us, following the events in Tunisia. If anyone had read my last post, you'll already know that this was coming. So, be prepared for more instability and chaos in the surrounding Arabic regions.
David Atlee Philips
The first step is to prime the mainstream media for the predictive programming of the viewing gullible masses. And, of course we've already seen this with the "scripted rhetoric" from the likes of the Fool, (aka, UK Channel 4 News, Jon Snow) and every other Rockefeller CFR (Counsel on Foreign Relations) run mainstream media outlet, following exactly the same script, proposing that following the (CIA staged) revolt in Tunisia, other surrounding Arab regions may follow, Que Egypt. Surely, it would take a fool not to predict this, as we can expect more. This is the same age old familiar signature of the CIA and a Rothschild favourite, as history documents. They've been using the same tactics since the early 1950s. They applied it to Iran in 1951, as the man who orchestrated the assassination of JFK proudly boasted (David Atlee Phillips, aka Maurice Bishop). Following their success in Iran, the agency, under the direction of brothers, John Foster & Alan Dulles, applied exactly the same tactics throughout regions in Latin American.  Such operations are a matter of recorded history and since, declassified.

Proud of their achievements at fermenting revolution, the CIA failed to apply the same tactics in The Bay of Pigs, hence their unforgiving fury with JFK. We can see the same pattern being repeated throughout the world today.

The current targets are rich in black gold, and the elites want it. Other regions have been destabilized through the application of HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme), since they posed no military threat and made no financial contribution to the global economic market, (i.e. Rothschild World Bank) yet possessed valuable natural resources.

This can be further verified in my previous posts, The Confessions of an Economic Hitman


5 comments :

  1. I am confused by the point-of-view of the article. The deposed ruler of Tunisia was a brutal dictator supported by the U.S. and the E.U. The rulers of Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia are all "authoritarian" governments and puppets of the U.S. This is well-known.

    So...where does the CIA and/or the New World Order fit in? That is, what's the purpose of them upsetting a status-quo that IS the powers-that-be?

    We know that the phony color-revolutions of eastern Europe and Georgia and the anti-government agitators in Belarus and Iran were and are supported by the NGO's funded by the CIA and western governments. But that's because those countries did not or don't have governments willing to submit to the NATO-U.S. hegemony and New World Order. Tunisia was and Egypt is (as of today) still firmly in control by the powers-that-be.

    So...again...where does the CIA agitation fit in as an agitator against the status quo in Tunisia and Egypt? I don't get it. I don't get the logic. I can't draw a map or a strategy where they fit in. Please--and I mean this seriously--enlighten me in this regard.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Of course, you're absolutely right. However, I'm afraid you seem to have missed my point, or perhaps I should have elaborated more.

    Such ruthless dictators are placed in position by the CIA to fatten the calf. Once they've served their purpose, the US steps in, under the pretence of being the liberator.

    Think about it. Its the same situation in Afghanistan at the moment. Kazia is a ruthless crook, pliable to the US, yet they will be seen as justifiable in removing him, once he's served his purpose.

    It was only a matter of time that the CIA would set their site on Tunisia, Egypt and now Yemen. Because, they possess the last remaining supplies of black gold, and Rockefeller and Rothschild want it.

    I did refer you to some films to illustrate this. Have a look at "Confessions of an Economic Hitman".

    Hopefully, that will enlighten you.

    Thanks for your comments. Much appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, Glenn, here it is a few days later. I've been watching the live stream on Al-Jazeera. Early on I saw their interview with U.S. State Dept spokesman PJ Crowley. I loved that they pursued him with tough, factual questions in a long interview. It would never happen on American Mass Media.

    Friday night 1-28-11 on the Alex Jones show in the last half hour of his show he asked of his two guests the same question I asked vis-a-vis reports such as yours. By today's show, Sunday 1-30-11 he was convinced Soros and others were behind this. NOT that the grievances and the revolt of the people of Egypt and elsewhere aren't real and legitimate. They completely are. Rather, it's that the when the powers-that-be realize they can no longer keep their puppet in power, they then take steps to steer the popular revolt in such a way that the people receive another puppet--albeit perhaps with a friendlier face. Most of the times it works (Iran after 1979 being one of the few exceptions.)

    I must say I am totally convinced by the way he presented it and by your comments. I was totally bored by Democracy Now's reporting--wasting time on parsing Biden's comment that Mubarak is not a dictator--because it is so NPR-ish in giving a "good" report of the events (within parameters acceptable to and/or distorted by the dictates of the controlling class) and NOT AT ALL giving a big picture view of how the Fed's quantitative easing is causing inflation throughout the world and ruining what little purchasing power people have to buy food and necessities. Democracy Now totally misses the big picture of Soros and NGO's and phony color revolutions, NATO encirclement of Russia and the rest. Even though Alexander Cockburn doesn't believe in "conspiracies", he certainly understands how Soros and NGOs work to push the New World Order agenda (including Eugenics). http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn10082010.html

    The San Francisco Bay Guardian 10 years or so ago had a series on how The Tides Foundation--an incubator for environmental and social justice organizations--and other non-profits are used by the powers-that-be to funnel youthful energy into acceptable (and controllable) forms of protest.

    In Tunisia day-by-day the people kept insisting on cleaning out people attached to the old government. Alex Jones notes, though, that Soros et al have layers upon layers of back-up choices--so that no matter how much house-cleaning you think you are doing you still most likely end up with one of their "people".

    For me the simplest way to follow this is to wait until Clinton or others start complaining about the "mistaken choices" the people of Egypt are making. THEN we'll know that the people of Egypt are on the right track.

    BUT, then again, as Alex Jones points out, the U.S. et al finance radically regressive Islamacists because, when all else fails, that's the next best choice for popular control.

    It is going to take a lot of attention to figure out what is really going on and whether or not a real setback for the PTB can have any hope of taking place.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, Glenn, here it is a few days later. I've been watching the live stream on Al-Jazeera. Early on I saw their interview with U.S. State Dept spokesman PJ Crowley. I loved that they pursued him with tough, factual questions in a long interview. It would never happen on American Mass Media.

    Friday night 1-28-11 on the Alex Jones show in the last half hour of his show he asked of his two guests the same question I asked vis-a-vis reports such as yours. By today's show, Sunday 1-30-11 he was convinced Soros and others were behind this. NOT that the grievances and the revolt of the people of Egypt and elsewhere aren't real and legitimate. They completely are. Rather, it's that the when the powers-that-be realize they can no longer keep their puppet in power, they then take steps to steer the popular revolt in such a way that the people receive another puppet--albeit perhaps with a friendlier face. Most of the times it works (Iran after 1979 being one of the few exceptions.)

    I must say I am totally convinced by the way he presented it and by your comments. I was totally bored by Democracy Now's reporting--wasting time on parsing Biden's comment that Mubarak is not a dictator--because it is so NPR-ish in giving a "good" report of the events (within parameters acceptable to and/or distorted by the dictates of the controlling class) and NOT AT ALL giving a big picture view of how the Fed's quantitative easing is causing inflation throughout the world and ruining what little purchasing power people have to buy food and necessities. Democracy Now totally misses the big picture of Soros and NGO's and phony color revolutions, NATO encirclement of Russia and the rest. Even though Alexander Cockburn doesn't believe in "conspiracies", he certainly understands how Soros and NGOs work to push the New World Order agenda (including Eugenics). http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn10082010.html

    The San Francisco Bay Guardian 10 years or so ago had a series on how The Tides Foundation--an incubator for environmental and social justice organizations--and other non-profits are used by the powers-that-be to funnel youthful energy into acceptable (and controllable) forms of protest.

    In Tunisia day-by-day the people kept insisting on cleaning out people attached to the old government. Alex Jones notes, though, that Soros et al have layers upon layers of back-up choices--so that no matter how much house-cleaning you think you are doing you still most likely end up with one of their "people".

    For me the simplest way to follow this is to wait until Clinton or others start complaining about the "mistaken choices" the people of Egypt are making. THEN we'll know that the people of Egypt are on the right track.

    BUT, then again, as Alex Jones points out, the U.S. et al finance radically regressive Islamacists because, when all else fails, that's the next best choice for popular control.

    It is going to take a lot of attention to figure out what is really going on and whether or not a real setback for the PTB can have any hope of taking place.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I hope you do not mind but I have posted this article just a few moments ago. All due credits given, of course.

    The most important AHA moment I wish to pass on to my readers is the connection to the Rothschild banks. Those schmucks got into the Dubai banking system just over a year ago, much to the dismay of some of my friends there.

    The big difference, as you may or may not know, is that Muslim banks do not charge interest. That is a prime reason for their desire to get in there also... and should they start, the people will NOT take it lying down.

    I also notice they are removing the old decrepit leaders, having brought the people low as they could.

    These old creatures will be deposed and replaced by younger friendlier despots (shhhh! no one is supposed to know that!) who will come across to the people as kinder hipper leaders.

    The people may get a few small concessions... but in reality, thsir nations are just that much closer to the Rothschild web of death.

    The hidden hand has been working on this for some time of course. Consider what they did in Iran in the 1950's.

    Watch out for Omar Sulieman or EBaradei. They are both owned.

    oh, and your blog is added to my already busting out of the seams blogroll.

    ReplyDelete